I’m doing a job that’s fairly demanding of resources. I’m using a lot of instances of Kontakt 8, or at least more than I usually do, and my aging beast of an i9 iMac is barely blinking.
I’m fairly new to K8 and I realize that most of you who are on Mac aren’t on Intel. Still I wonder-are you finding K8 less demanding of resources than K5 or 6?
There's more than meets the eye
Register now to unlock all subforums and the ability to search. As a guest, your view is limited to only a part of The Sound Board.
Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
-
Lawrence
Topic author - Posts: 9099
- Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
- Location: New York City
-
Guy Rowland
- Posts: 16926
- Joined: Aug 02, 2015 8:11 pm
- Location: UK
- Contact:
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
I honestly don't know, will be interested to hear others perspectives. My flawed sense is that 4 and 5 were good, 6 was getting a bit woozy, 7 was a mess, 8 is bringing it back.
-
wst3
- Posts: 4032
- Joined: Sep 16, 2015 4:56 pm
- Location: The Western Philly 'burbs
- Contact:
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
I haven't tried to beat the snot out of Kontakt 8 yet, but thus far it works (even if I struggle a bit with the new UI). Perhaps I should pull up an old project that made the poor thing pant?
-
Lawrence
Topic author - Posts: 9099
- Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
- Location: New York City
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
Bill, if you do please let me know the results!
-
Luke
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Nov 15, 2015 2:40 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
Having used v6 as a workhorse for way too long, my sense is that v5 was king for me. Loved that version, it was stable on my system and light on resources, and we had ample time before the quicker updates of the following version, or so I seem to remember. K8 is doing mighty fine though, especially considering its predecessor. It's fairly stable if not quick. Resource management seems ok to me. I downgraded to 64 GB on a laptop from 96 GB and so far it has not been an issue at all. Buffers are low and the engine handles everything well enough, even in mixed environments (K6 + K8, legacy projects/templates). I'm optimistic that they're listening.
Pale Blue Dot.
Luke
Luke
-
Lawrence
Topic author - Posts: 9099
- Joined: Aug 23, 2015 3:28 am
- Location: New York City
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
Hey Luke,
Good to hear. Luckily, I skipped Kontakt 7 so the bad experiences of others were never an issue. It was always 5 and 6 for me, and while they seemed ok, Kontakt 8 seems to be more efficient.
Up to this point I have had mixed sessions (due to some concern about how Kontakt 8 would function.) This is the first session I’ve gone with K8 exclusively and it’s been a happy experience.
Good to hear. Luckily, I skipped Kontakt 7 so the bad experiences of others were never an issue. It was always 5 and 6 for me, and while they seemed ok, Kontakt 8 seems to be more efficient.
Up to this point I have had mixed sessions (due to some concern about how Kontakt 8 would function.) This is the first session I’ve gone with K8 exclusively and it’s been a happy experience.
-
Luke
- Posts: 1355
- Joined: Nov 15, 2015 2:40 pm
- Location: Earth
Re: Is Kontakt 8 more optimized?
Same, Larry. I've built the latest doc template around K8. It's working well, or at least I'm not noticing any hang-ups that are out of the ordinary (I do get some random crashes but they seem connected to Logic as a whole and are rare enough to leave alone).
Pale Blue Dot.
Luke
Luke